francois.remy.dev at outlook.com
Mon Aug 12 17:40:33 PDT 2013
> Wait, what? The semantics of the web demands that runaway JS block any other even turns, or page layout/rendering from proceeding. Multi-process browsers can prevent cross-origin pages from interfering with each other, and Servo can do speculative layout to reward well-behaved pages, but badly-behaved pages unavoidably destroy the UX. Maybe I'm unimaginative but the only alternative to the slow-script dialog I can see is to allow a page to completely destroy itself unrecoverably.
I don't think of you as unimaginative, but I think there are other options. Sure, there must be a way to "kill" a script that's burning your CPU but it doesn't have to be a dialog.
Firstly, there's nothing really preventing a browser to perform a layout if it actually pauses the script, even if it may be hard to pause a thread while keeping all its pointer safe in an environment that's changed by another thread. But this is not impossible.
Secondly, when a website becomes resource-intensive, you can display a "toolbar" saying 'This website looks to overuse your computer.' with a (stop the script) button that doesn't interrupt your experience (you can switch tab if you want, which will in return cause the tab to get way less system resources since he's in the background) or continue to use the website if it turns out it's just slow but not stuck in an infinite loop.
By the way this kind of solution is totally applicable to setTimeout/setInterval loops that for now aren't covered by the script dialog, or a script that overuse your GPU with offscreen WebGL.
More information about the es-discuss