brendan at mozilla.com
Fri Aug 9 20:52:35 PDT 2013
Rick Waldron wrote:
> My argument was specifically about the current meaning of the ascii
> exclamation "!" and that assigning it an additional context-based
> meaning that's quite the opposite of the current unary operator meaning,
Ok, and I'm with you (recall Mark M. wants ! as restricted-production
binary operator for promises), but you still swapped refutable and
> isn't a proposal that I would support. This is stated with no regard
> for previous refutable matching proposals.
Right, but remember: the kind of destructuring that imputes undefined
for missing property is irrefutable. Can't refute so can't mismatch so
can't fall thru to later match-case. That's all I wanted to get across ;-).
More information about the es-discuss