Creating your own errors

Allen Wirfs-Brock allen at wirfs-brock.com
Tue Aug 6 12:31:36 PDT 2013


We did discuss this, as record in https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=224 , and concluded that we it we didn't want to add any new built-in exceptions.  Of the existing exceptions , RangeError is closest in concept to what might be described as ValueError.

Allen

On Aug 6, 2013, at 11:51 AM, Brendan Eich wrote:

> Problem is, "TypeError" for what Python calls "ValueError", what JS might call "DomainError" to go with "RangeError", is lame. Allen, Rick, I forget: have we discussed DomainError or ValueError?
> 
> /be
> 
> Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Jonas Sicking<jonas at sicking.cc>  wrote:
>>> Good point. It's entirely plausible that we could simply use the ES
>>> SyntaxError in all cases where DOMException SyntaxError is being
>>> thrown today. Would need to be tested though.
>> 
>> SyntaxError is used by JavaScript for syntax errors in JavaScript. We
>> shouldn't use it for where we throw "SyntaxError" in platform APIs
>> today per discussion with Allen. (He considered the usage for JSON
>> already as a mistake.)
>> 
>> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130806/dc86b143/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list