is [[Prototype]] of global object intentionally unspecified?

David Bruant bruant.d at gmail.com
Mon Aug 5 14:52:34 PDT 2013


Le 05/08/2013 20:11, Brendan Eich a écrit :
> David Bruant wrote:
>> Would it make sense to leave ECMAScript spec intact (global's 
>> [[Prototype]] is implementation-dependent),
>
> No, we want interop across, e.g., Node.js and browsers, on such 
> "features" as whether toString resolves as a global reference.
Filed https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1714

David


More information about the es-discuss mailing list