Destructuring Assignment spec status
dmitry.soshnikov at gmail.com
Fri Aug 2 15:01:24 PDT 2013
Actually, I found some notes (
The consensus is there only to not ToObject(RHS). Seems
refutable/irrefutable feature still is not agreed?
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Dmitry Soshnikov <dmitry.soshnikov at gmail.com
> Destructuring assignment (aka "non-strict pattern matching") seems was in
> the draft spec for a while.
> I'm currently implementing the feature in our local code transforms
> pipeline, and it seemed to me that there is/was already a pretty stable
> agreement on it.
> Currently what I see is: irrefutable match with default values (plus,
> spread/rest for arrays). However, I was informed that on the last meeting
> the topic was raised again and the refutable/irrefutable aspects where
> brought to the discussion again.
> (it seems like this "refutable/irrefutable" thing was here for couple of
> years already)
> I wanted to clarify the current status, how active the topic is, was the
> consensus achieved before, and how likely the current semantics will be
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss