Promises Consensus with /A+ terminology

Mark S. Miller erights at
Fri Aug 2 14:09:47 PDT 2013

A good start would be to convert <> to test262 form,
extending test262 in the process in order to accommodate async testing. Any

In the meantime, <> itself
is still a good start for most purposes.

On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan at> wrote:

> David Bruant wrote:
>> I believe that to a large extent, the risk of both misunderstanding of
>> intent and misexpression understood intent would be largely reduced by a
>> test suite.
> +∞
> /be

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list