sam at cateches.is
Tue Apr 30 11:01:03 PDT 2013
> Lucas Smith wrote:
>> IMO, cancelation is not appropriate for promises/futures. (sticking
>> with the name "promises", sorry for the distraction).
Perhaps I'm missing something, but is cancel() conceptually different from passing a Future's corresponding Resolver around so that the program can invoke reject() at will? This seems like it's a new, "irretrievably broken" way to do something you already can do.
More information about the es-discuss