Futures

Juan Ignacio Dopazo dopazo.juan at gmail.com
Fri Apr 26 12:27:36 PDT 2013


2013/4/26 Kevin Smith <zenparsing at gmail.com>

>
>  Oops yeah. I guess that should be fixed. :/
>>>
>>
>> Fixing that would break compatibility with Promises/A+. To remain
>> compatible with A+ and unwrap only one layer, the spec would need a way to
>> discern promises from thenables.
>>
>
> I don't think so.  It has no bearing on Promises/A+, because A+ doesn't
> test the case where the promise's value is itself a promise.
>

Yes, sorry. It will on version 1.1:
https://github.com/promises-aplus/promises-spec/#the-promise-resolution-procedure

Juan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130426/6f2a91bf/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list