Juan Ignacio Dopazo
dopazo.juan at gmail.com
Fri Apr 26 12:27:36 PDT 2013
2013/4/26 Kevin Smith <zenparsing at gmail.com>
> Oops yeah. I guess that should be fixed. :/
>> Fixing that would break compatibility with Promises/A+. To remain
>> compatible with A+ and unwrap only one layer, the spec would need a way to
>> discern promises from thenables.
> I don't think so. It has no bearing on Promises/A+, because A+ doesn't
> test the case where the promise's value is itself a promise.
Yes, sorry. It will on version 1.1:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss