Modules: Curly Free

Kevin Smith zenparsing at
Tue Apr 23 06:05:16 PDT 2013

> No, this does not require a semantic extension. I think everyone
> agrees that environments should not have symbol-named variables.
> However, this is neither here nor there for module instance objects,
> which are reflections of module exports as "plain" JS objects. There
> is no semantic extension required for them to have symbol-named
> properties.
I think it rather points points to the hack:  you propose that a module
instance object have a property which does not correspond to some lexical

{ Kevin }
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list