Modules: Curly Free

Andreas Rossberg rossberg at
Mon Apr 22 07:50:44 PDT 2013

On 22 April 2013 16:45, Quildreen Motta <quildreen at> wrote:
> Andreas is suggesting we adopt a convention or "design pattern" for
> anonymous exports. Dave is suggesting that it should be supported at the
> syntax level, so you get language-level guarantees rather than wishful
> thinking.

What guarantees do you have in mind? AFAICT, you get the same
guarantees in both cases, because all named module imports are
statically checked.


More information about the es-discuss mailing list