Futures

David Bruant bruant.d at gmail.com
Mon Apr 22 06:21:55 PDT 2013


Le 22/04/2013 15:12, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 1:37 PM, David Bruant <bruant.d at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I personally wonder whether the compatibility with existing libraries is so
>> important. It should be pretty easy to wrap a native future into a library
>> future (aren't native futures already Promise/A+ compatible?) and vice
>> versa. Why isn't it enough to help with compatibility with libraries?
> They are compatible because of how futures make use of then.
Were they not, how big of a burden would wrapping be?
Especially given that it's only for a transitioning period where native 
(or polyfilled) have to cohabit with previous library promises?

David


More information about the es-discuss mailing list