Futures

Anne van Kesteren annevk at annevk.nl
Mon Apr 22 06:12:58 PDT 2013


On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 1:37 PM, David Bruant <bruant.d at gmail.com> wrote:
> I personally wonder whether the compatibility with existing libraries is so
> important. It should be pretty easy to wrap a native future into a library
> future (aren't native futures already Promise/A+ compatible?) and vice
> versa. Why isn't it enough to help with compatibility with libraries?

They are compatible because of how futures make use of then.


--
http://annevankesteren.nl/


More information about the es-discuss mailing list