More flexibility in the ECMAScript part? (was: Re: Futures

Kevin Smith zenparsing at gmail.com
Thu Apr 18 08:35:44 PDT 2013


> I still think the best solution to this is for the developer tools to
> curate a list of unhandled rejections. Just like `window.onerror` and the
> developer console work together to display unhandled exceptions, unhandled
> rejections could be treated very similarly. They would appear in the
> console while unhandled, then disappear when/if handled. (And there could
> be programmatic hooks too, just like window.onerror, e.g.
> `window.onunhandledrejection`/`window.onrejectionhandled`.)
>

That could certainly work for browsers, but what about node and its console?

Also, can someone point me to a real-world example of delayed rejection
handling?

{ Kevin }
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130418/b676ffbc/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list