Futures (was: Request for JSON-LD API review)

Jorge jorge at jorgechamorro.com
Thu Apr 18 06:00:48 PDT 2013

On 17/04/2013, at 17:46, Anne van Kesteren wrote:

>> If it was up to me JavaScript would just be part of the W3C
> and we would not have to deal with that layer of distraction.

On 17/04/2013, at 19:48, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:

> I strongly support any efforts to move JS standardization into the
> umbrella of the W3C.

The very thought of it sends chills down my spine.

The w3c has demonstrated blindness and incompetence. Remember how and why the whatwg came to be? Stop pretending. You guys ought to be deeply embarrassed because HTML5 is *not* your child.

Who wants a JS infested of inconvenient APIs w3c-style?
( Jorge )();

More information about the es-discuss mailing list