More flexibility in the ECMAScript part?
bruant.d at gmail.com
Thu Apr 18 00:48:22 PDT 2013
Le 18/04/2013 09:40, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:07 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Note that Futures are entirely expressible in today's JS semantics.
>> (Not to say that it shouldn't be reviewed by the language gurus here,
>> just saying.)
> that is not true. HTML defines the event loop model and processing
What do you expect to be difficult? I foresee that it's going to be *a
lot* of work on both sides (W3C/WHATWG & TC39) to move this major piece
from one place to another without breaking anything. But I would say
it's a lot of "easy" work. It's going to take a lot of eyeballs and
probably tests to make sure what the new spec jonction between HTML LS
and ES7 conforms to what exists in reality (expecially in the new prose).
Is there a particular part of this work that you expect to be difficult.
More information about the es-discuss