Must built-in prototypes also be valid instances? (Was: Why DataView.prototype object's [[Class]] is "Object"?)
brendan at mozilla.org
Sat Sep 29 22:24:57 PDT 2012
Mark S. Miller wrote:
> Security aside, given maximin
> class Foo
> what do you suggest Foo.prototype be?
If classes are sugar for constructor functions, an Object instance, just
as you'd get for
There has always been an unsightly difference between built-in
constructors and user-defined ones. Whether or how we reduce that gulf
is separable from what the [[NativeBrand]] or [[Class]] of a built-in's
prototype should be.
When self-hosting built-ins, this matters. Suppose [[NativeBrand]] could
be a symbol private to the built-ins. That would allow the engine to set
up bespoke-looking prototypes as it needs to for ES1-5 compatibility.
But should user-defined classes have access to this symbol?
More information about the es-discuss