Why TypeArray instead of TypedArray?

[Allen Wirfs-Brock]

certainly a bug, and one that in this case was propagated from the wiki page.

As stated in the change notes, the binary data material in Rev10 is just place holder material copied from the Wiki. It isn't yet at all definitive and it would be a waste to spend very much time reviewing it.

Allen


On Sep 29, 2012, at 12:36 PM, Rick Waldron wrote:

> 
> 
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Yusuke Suzuki <utatane.tea at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> In rev10 draft, TypeArray is described.
> But why TypeArray instead of TypedArray? In WebGL's spec( http://www.khronos.org/registry/typedarray/specs/latest/ ), TypedArray is used, so I think using TypedArray name is better.
> 
> Looks like a typo... I went ahead and filed a bug
> 
> https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673
>  
> TypeArray name makes me think array of types, such as [String, Array, Object, Function].
> 
> Ha, I was thinking the same thing :)
>  
> 
> Regards,
> Yusuke Suzuki
> 
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20120929/62eb45db/attachment-0001.html>