Why TypeArray instead of TypedArray?

Yusuke Suzuki utatane.tea at gmail.com
Sat Sep 29 12:41:35 PDT 2012


Ah, thanks. I've got it :)

On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Rick Waldron <waldron.rick at gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Yusuke Suzuki <utatane.tea at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> In rev10 draft, TypeArray is described.
>> But why TypeArray instead of TypedArray? In WebGL's spec(
>> http://www.khronos.org/registry/typedarray/specs/latest/ ), TypedArray
>> is used, so I think using TypedArray name is better.
>>
>
> Looks like a typo... I went ahead and filed a bug
>
> https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673
>
>
>> TypeArray name makes me think array of types, such as [String, Array,
>> Object, Function].
>>
>
> Ha, I was thinking the same thing :)
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Yusuke Suzuki
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20120930/3bc4ec8b/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list