Why TypeArray instead of TypedArray?

[Rick Waldron]

On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Yusuke Suzuki <utatane.tea at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> In rev10 draft, TypeArray is described.
> But why TypeArray instead of TypedArray? In WebGL's spec(
> http://www.khronos.org/registry/typedarray/specs/latest/ ), TypedArray is
> used, so I think using TypedArray name is better.
>

Looks like a typo... I went ahead and filed a bug

https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673


> TypeArray name makes me think array of types, such as [String, Array,
> Object, Function].
>

Ha, I was thinking the same thing :)


>
> Regards,
> Yusuke Suzuki
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20120929/fbc671fd/attachment.html>