Destructuring, Defaults, Covering

[Erik Arvidsson]

Yes, this looks like the same issue.

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Kevin Smith <khs4473 at gmail.com> wrote:
> There's an open draft issue here:
>
> https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=653
>
> which points out a problem with allowing destructuring assignment forms
> like:
>
>     ({ x = "initializer" } = { }); // Identifier followed by an initializer,
> not covered by object literal
>
> but is there not also an issue for the same syntax in destructuring binding
> patterns with respect to arrow function parameter lists?
>
>     ({ x = "initializer" }) => {}; // Again, not covered by object literal
>
> Thanks!
>
> Kevin
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>



-- 
erik