Destructuring, Defaults, Covering

[Kevin Smith]

There's an open draft issue here:

https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=653

which points out a problem with allowing destructuring assignment forms
like:

    ({ x = "initializer" } = { }); // Identifier followed by an
initializer, not covered by object literal

but is there not also an issue for the same syntax in destructuring binding
patterns with respect to arrow function parameter lists?

    ({ x = "initializer" }) => {}; // Again, not covered by object literal

Thanks!

Kevin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20120924/d5aa07e8/attachment.html>