Arrows Not Primary?
waldron.rick at gmail.com
Mon Sep 24 06:31:30 PDT 2012
Do you think this is something worth adding a "Note" entry to the spec for?
If so, we should file a ticket
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Kevin Smith <khs4473 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Never mind - it's to prevent grammatical ambiguity in the concise form.
> Sorry for the noise.
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Kevin Smith <khs4473 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Looking at the July 8 Draft, I notice that arrow functions are produced
>> by AssignmentExpression, not PrimaryExpression (as function expressions
>> are). Why is that? Is it to limit the operators that can be applied to
>> When descent parsing, we have to drill down into primary expression to
>> parse the "maybe-paren-expresion", so it's more straightforward to parse
>> arrows there.
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss