Arrows Not Primary?

[Kevin Smith]

Never mind - it's to prevent grammatical ambiguity in the concise form.
 Sorry for the noise.

Kevin

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Kevin Smith <khs4473 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Looking at the July 8 Draft, I notice that arrow functions are produced by
> AssignmentExpression, not PrimaryExpression (as function expressions are).
>  Why is that?  Is it to limit the operators that can be applied to them?
>
> When descent parsing, we have to drill down into primary expression to
> parse the "maybe-paren-expresion", so it's more straightforward to parse
> arrows there.
>
> Thanks!
> Kevin
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20120924/ddaea77a/attachment.html>