Arrows Not Primary?
khs4473 at gmail.com
Mon Sep 24 06:15:02 PDT 2012
Never mind - it's to prevent grammatical ambiguity in the concise form.
Sorry for the noise.
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Kevin Smith <khs4473 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Looking at the July 8 Draft, I notice that arrow functions are produced by
> AssignmentExpression, not PrimaryExpression (as function expressions are).
> Why is that? Is it to limit the operators that can be applied to them?
> When descent parsing, we have to drill down into primary expression to
> parse the "maybe-paren-expresion", so it's more straightforward to parse
> arrows there.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss