General comment on ES 402 test suite (i18n)

[Nebojša Ćirić]

Also, CLDR vs ISO currency bug - http://unicode.org/cldr/trac/ticket/5302


2012/9/10 Nebojša Ćirić <cira at google.com>

> Btw. I've filed a bug wrt. de-DD with ICU -
> http://bugs.icu-project.org/trac/ticket/9562
>
>
> 2012/9/10 Nebojša Ćirić <cira at google.com>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2012/9/10 Norbert Lindenberg <ecmascript at norbertlindenberg.com>
>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 10, 2012, at 13:24 , Nebojša Ćirić wrote:
>>>
>>> >> Can you provide bug IDs?
>>> >
>>> >    # ICU bug http://bugs.icu-project.org/trac/ticket/9547
>>> >   'data/test/suite/intl402/ch11/11.3/11.3.2_TRP.js': 'FAIL',
>>> >   # ICU bug http://bugs.icu-project.org/trac/ticket/9265
>>> >   'data/test/suite/intl402/ch09/9.2/9.2.5_11_g_ii_2.js': 'FAIL'
>>> >
>>> >  I don't have actual bug ID for ISO - CLDR issue (the fraction digits
>>> for currencies). I'll talk to Mark about it.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> >> > 8/25 EF are from not implementing the i18n support for
>>> localeCompare and similar functions (yet).
>>> >>
>>> >> Looking forward to more info on this once you get there.
>>> >>
>>> > As soon as we ratify the spec :).
>>>
>>> Would be good to try this before we ratify. Just don't ship it yet :-)
>>>
>>> > NativeJSFormatter is V8 C++ method and it can detect if it was called
>>> as constructor or not. But by the time I call it it's already too late.
>>> It's interesting that requirement like this is in ES spec, but they don't
>>> provide a way to check/enforce it.
>>>
>>> Have you talked to the V8 team about this and the prototype issue?
>>>
>>
>> I filled a bug about prototype issue -
>> http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=2293.
>> As for the new/constructor issue they pointed out the internal C++ method
>> I can't use (as mentioned). I am not sure they can do much there without
>> actual ES spec telling them what/how to do it.
>>
>>
>>>  > > 2/6 F are from 1x.3_a.js tests, where 0 property of Array.prototype
>>> is tainted. I don't know how to guard against this. Any pointers?
>>> >
>>> > You mean 9.2.1_2.js and 9.2.6_2.js? The spec here refers to the List
>>> specification type, and I implemented List objects using Array methods that
>>> you have to grab before anybody can replace them.
>>> >
>>> > Methods are fine, but what do you do with '0' property. You can't grab
>>> all indices in range to protect override.
>>>
>>> List.prototype = Object.create(null);
>>>
>>> > I have to check why:
>>> >
>>> > Object.defineProperty(Intl.Collator, 'prototype', new Intl.Collator())
>>>
>>> I changed the spec a while ago to not use an actual Collator object as
>>> the prototype object, after Allen and Suzuki-san reported problems with
>>> this approach. Use Intl.Collator.call({}) with the standard built-in values
>>> of Intl.Collator and Function.prototype.call instead.
>>>
>>>
>> I'll try that, thanks.
>>
>> --
>> Nebojša Ćirić
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Nebojša Ćirić
>



-- 
Nebojša Ćirić
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20120911/a1aa52e4/attachment.html>