new function syntax and poison pill methods
Mark S. Miller
erights at google.com
Fri Oct 26 18:04:11 PDT 2012
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Waldemar Horwat <waldemar at google.com>wrote:
>> How about: there must be no /nonstandard non-configurable properties/ of
>> standard objects.
> Wouldn't that just preclude us from ever adding new standard
> non-configurable properties to standard objects in the future?
AFAICT, it would mean that, if these properties become standard starting in
version N+1, an implementation conforming to version N must either
* not have these properties,
* must have them be configurable, or
* must instead claim that it is now attempting conformance with N+1.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss