ES accessor usage guidelines (Was: Map/Set.prototype.size)

Brendan Eich brendan at mozilla.org
Mon Oct 15 16:02:18 PDT 2012


Yehuda Katz wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.org 
> <mailto:brendan at mozilla.org>> wrote:
>
>     Yehuda Katz wrote:
>
>
>             * get/set accessor may have effects on 'set' (see the DOM) but
>             only on the receiver object (and unobservably, any
>         children that
>             become garbage, e.g. when trimming .length on an array-like).
>
>
>         DOM methods like `innerHTML=` seem to violate this particular
>         wording (but perhaps not the spirit?)
>
>
>     Definitely the spirit!
>
>     That's one of those "children become garbage" cases, unless I
>     misunderstand your point. "The receiver" for .innerHTML includes
>     all descendants.
>
>
> Yeah that makes sense, although the exact side-effects might be more 
> observable with DOM. Relatedly, are we specifically exempting 
> Object.observe and DOM Mutation observers from the "observability" 
> requirement?

Yes, or at least: I wasn't considering those (or Proxies, as David 
pointed out) in my "first cut".

Some of this must be excluded from any such "Design Rules".

/be


More information about the es-discuss mailing list