khs4473 at gmail.com
Fri Oct 12 19:51:05 PDT 2012
> Yes, although I don't take the "private, who needs it?" attitude as easily
> as you do. Not saying it's wrong, but I'm not 100% convinced yet.
In a way I'm posing a challenge - I think it will be an interesting debate
Doesn't this have the same problem you were arguing against in your
> previous message, that if you want to import 37 names, you have to name
> them all individually?
Sure, if we were inclined to import 37 names, but I don't think that will
be the pattern. Look at current usage of "underscored" property names.
Their usage is mostly confined to a single site (usually a class).
Only occasionally will you find an underscored property name whose
semantic origin is non-local (usually in class hierarchies).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss