Mootools and String.prototype.contains

Alex Russell slightlyoff at google.com
Fri Oct 12 07:30:07 PDT 2012


Good context. I didn't know that they had b0rked bind() as well ;-)

I feel like there's as PSA we should write over on webplatform.org for
library authors about how to not be future hostile.


On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Geoffrey Sneddon <gsneddon at opera.com>wrote:

> On 12/10/12 14:50, David Bruant wrote:
>
>> I was looking at Bugzilla and came across two bugs [1] [2] related to
>> Mootools-based (only Mootools 1.2-) websites being broken by the inclusion
>> of String.prototype.contains in SpiderMonkey.
>> I don't think it's been brought to the list yet, though I think it's
>> relevant.
>>
>
> Given there were similar issues with Function.prototype.bind in the same
> release of Mootools, I'm inclined to let it slide: Mootools 1.2 already
> broke given ES5, and that was pushed through regardless.
>
> --
> Geoffrey Sneddon — Opera Software
> <http://gsnedders.com>
> <http://opera.com>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/**listinfo/es-discuss<https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20121012/1c887b3e/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list