Symbols, Protocols, Frames, and Versioning
khs4473 at gmail.com
Fri Oct 5 06:56:27 PDT 2012
> Indeed, which is why I'm not sure I understand what this idea is
> trying to achieve. Is it more than just an ad hoc way to introduce a
> second namespace?
Presumably, so that such a namespace can be used with a
A question: is
var symbol = new Symbol.for("abcdefg");
really a symbol? Or is it just a string, masquerading as a symbol?
If we answer that it's just a string, then perhaps instead of extending the
concept of Symbol to include "wrapped" strings, we should extend the
concept of property-name-substitution to include string targets.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss