Symbols, Protocols, Frames, and Versioning

Dean Landolt dean at
Thu Oct 4 14:54:44 PDT 2012

On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan at> wrote:

> Dean Landolt wrote:
>  On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan at<mailto:
>> brendan at>> wrote:
>>     Urgh, namespace is misleading, it suggests Common Lisp's symbol
>>     packages, the AS3/ES4 namespaces, XML namespaces. Here, @iterator
>>     is not a prefix or part of a pair, or set-of-symbols. It's just a
>>     symbol you can find from a string.
>> I admit the historical baggage may be too much to shake but what we're
>> talking about here is quite precisely a namespace :)
> I don't think so, but definitions vary. Could you cite a source for yours?

I just meant in the literal sense: a "namespace" is just a string key
space. Using symbols as interned strings allows you to add any number of
"namespaces" to an object, including some language-defined "system"
namespace. And this is what we're after, isn't it?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list