Sets plus JSON

Tab Atkins Jr. jackalmage at gmail.com
Wed Oct 3 09:56:25 PDT 2012


On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Nicholas C. Zakas
<standards at nczconsulting.com> wrote:
> After a little more experimenting with sets (still a really big fan!!), I've
> come across an interesting problem. Basically, I found myself using a set
> and then wanting to convert that into JSON for storage. JSON.stringify() run
> on a set returns "{}", because it's an object without any enumerable
> properties. I'm wondering if that's the correct behavior because a set is
> really more like an array than it is an object, and perhaps it would be best
> to define a toJSON() method for sets such as:
>
> Set.prototype.toJSON = function() {
>     return Array.from(this);
> };
>
> That way, JSON.stringify() would do something rational by default when used
> with sets.

+1.  Sets clearly map closest into JSON arrays.  They don't roundtrip,
but that's a necessary evil.

~TJ


More information about the es-discuss mailing list