Suggestions for Set
erik.arvidsson at gmail.com
Wed Oct 3 07:47:36 PDT 2012
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Andreas Rossberg <rossberg at google.com> wrote:
> On 3 October 2012 05:38, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.com> wrote:
>> Which is more important, iterating over holes (preserved if possible), or
>> skipping them and therefore spreading array-likes but not iterables?
> I, for one, couldn't care less about holes. We shouldn't compromise
> any useful feature just for the sake of preserving some array hole
Filling in holes with undefined seems like the right thing to do.
People do not depend on holes.
Having Array.prototype. at iterator skip holes is bad because we don't
have the index so we don't know that anything was skipped.
To repeat myself; holes are not common and we should keep things
simple and having Array.prototype. at iterator iterate over array to
array[length - 1] is the most expected result.
More information about the es-discuss