Suggestions for Set
herby at mailbox.sk
Wed Oct 3 05:31:32 PDT 2012
Dean Landolt wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Jussi Kalliokoski
> <jussi.kalliokoski at gmail.com <mailto:jussi.kalliokoski at gmail.com>> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Andreas Rossberg
> <rossberg at google.com <mailto:rossberg at google.com>> wrote:
> On 3 October 2012 05:38, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.com
> <mailto:brendan at mozilla.com>> wrote:
> > Which is more important, iterating over holes (preserved if
> possible), or
> > skipping them and therefore spreading array-likes but not
> I, for one, couldn't care less about holes. We shouldn't compromise
> any useful feature just for the sake of preserving some array hole
> I agree. Unless there's a sane use case for holes with the spread
> operator, I don't think it makes sense to make compromises because
> of them, especially since we aren't breaking backwards compatibility
> or anything. We can actually make something better here.
> I seem to remember an issue re: what to do with infinite iterators
> (generators)? If that's correct, was there an agreed-upon resolution?
Does it need one? I mean, the process crashes on out-of-memory error.
Or is it some different issue here?
More information about the es-discuss