Suggestions for Set

Dean Landolt dean at deanlandolt.com
Wed Oct 3 03:54:14 PDT 2012


On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Jussi Kalliokoski <
jussi.kalliokoski at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Andreas Rossberg <rossberg at google.com>wrote:
>
>> On 3 October 2012 05:38, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.com> wrote:
>> > Which is more important, iterating over holes (preserved if possible),
>> or
>> > skipping them and therefore spreading array-likes but not iterables?
>>
>> I, for one, couldn't care less about holes. We shouldn't compromise
>> any useful feature just for the sake of preserving some array hole
>> craziness.
>>
>
> I agree. Unless there's a sane use case for holes with the spread
> operator, I don't think it makes sense to make compromises because of them,
> especially since we aren't breaking backwards compatibility or anything. We
> can actually make something better here.
>


I seem to remember an issue re: what to do with infinite iterators
(generators)? If that's correct, was there an agreed-upon resolution?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20121003/90a0b274/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list