Suggestions for Set

Jussi Kalliokoski jussi.kalliokoski at
Wed Oct 3 00:47:50 PDT 2012

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Andreas Rossberg <rossberg at>wrote:

> On 3 October 2012 05:38, Brendan Eich <brendan at> wrote:
> > Which is more important, iterating over holes (preserved if possible), or
> > skipping them and therefore spreading array-likes but not iterables?
> I, for one, couldn't care less about holes. We shouldn't compromise
> any useful feature just for the sake of preserving some array hole
> craziness.

I agree. Unless there's a sane use case for holes with the spread operator,
I don't think it makes sense to make compromises because of them,
especially since we aren't breaking backwards compatibility or anything. We
can actually make something better here.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list