Suggestions for Set
Mark S. Miller
erights at google.com
Tue Oct 2 14:43:21 PDT 2012
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Rick Waldron <waldron.rick at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Domenic Denicola <
> domenic at domenicdenicola.com> wrote:
>> From: Rick Waldron [waldron.rick at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 16:52
>> > No iteration for spread, per July 24 resolution
>> Oh, thanks for catching me on that. Silly Firefox...
>> This seems like an unfortunate decision, and I couldn't discern the
>> motivation in the minutes. When would I want to use a syntax that fails for
>> iterables? Does [...x] throw for an iterable, or result in something else?
> The direct reasoning for the resolution was:
> "Cannot be both iterable and array-like"
> It's possible that this could be added to the agenda for november, if
> Brendan wants to discuss SpiderMonkey's experience implementing it. It
> seems to me that if they're not having issues then it's at least worth a
Please do. I'd really like to see a more pleasant resolution if one can be
found. What does SpiderMonkey actually do?
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss