Must built-in prototypes also be valid instances? (Was: Why DataView.prototype object's [[Class]] is "Object"?)

Brendan Eich brendan at mozilla.org
Mon Oct 1 16:16:55 PDT 2012


Domenic Denicola wrote:
> On Oct 1, 2012, at 18:58, "Brendan Eich"<brendan at mozilla.org>  wrote:
>
>> I am warming up to the way CoffeeScript does things -- not the translation scheme, __extends, __super__ -- rather, the plain Object instance created as C.prototype that has B.prototype as its [[Prototype]] but has shadowing 'constructor' set to C.
>
> If I'm understanding correctly, this would be the same as
>
> C.prototype = Object.create(B.prototype);
> C.prototype.constructor = C;

Yes, CoffeeScript simply uses the older pattern (beget, goes back a long 
way to comp.lang.javascript, IIRC) to work on pre-ES5 engines.

> which I thought was the "recommended" approach (although by who or where, I admit I can't quite pinpoint). Am I on the right track? And can anyone else comment on the commonality or recommendedness of this pattern, to see if we're paving the right cow paths?

Would be good to confirm, but I think this is the one all the finest 
cows favor ;-).

/be


More information about the es-discuss mailing list