"no strict"; directive
rossberg at google.com
Thu Nov 15 12:33:04 PST 2012
On 15 November 2012 21:20, Andrea Giammarchi
<andrea.giammarchi at gmail.com> wrote:
> thanks for your contribution to this thread, appreciated. I'd like a proper
> answer now if that is possible.
You already got rather strong answers from two members of TC39. It's
safe to assume that the rest feels similar. To be clear: it's not only
not planned, but it would happen only over the dead body of half of
the committee. There were reasons why strict mode started ruling out
'caller' and 'with' in the first place.
More information about the es-discuss