Domenic Denicola domenic at
Fri Nov 9 11:32:35 PST 2012

From: es-discuss-bounces at [mailto:es-discuss-bounces at] On Behalf Of Mark S. Miller
Sent: Friday, November 9, 2012 08:33

> Hi David, thanks for your thoughtful post. I've always used the two-arg form of .then[1], but your post makes a strong case for more often using separate one-arg .then and .fail calls.

We have found this to be more expressive as well. Especially in ES5 environments, where we can use Q's alias of `catch` instead of `fail`:

p1.then(val => doStuff)
     .catch(err => console.error(err));

> I have been using "when" rather than "then". Because these are otherwise compatible AFAICT with A+, for the sake of consensus I'm willing to change this to "then" everywhere. But before I do, I'd like to make one last plea for "when" and see how this community responds.

I think perhaps because of my background as someone who has only ever programmed for nontrivial amounts of time in curly-bracket languages (C, C++, C#, JavaScript), I really don't see "then" as part of an "if-then-else" chain. None of your examples seem confusing to me! I don't know though, as this is obviously very subjective.

However, I see a lot of value in "when" as a word still. "Then" makes sense when used as a method:


But "when" makes sense when used as a function:

let this = doThis();
let that = when(this, doThat);
let anotherThing = when(that, doAnotherThing);

or even

let that = when(this).then(doThat);

where here `when()` is either making a value into a promise or assimilating an untrusted (or crappily-implemented) promise.

It also, to me, makes sense when used as a message, in the sense of promiseSend. This is a bit less important though I guess.

More information about the es-discuss mailing list