Finding a "safety syntax" for classes
russell.leggett at gmail.com
Tue Mar 20 11:53:13 PDT 2012
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Rick Waldron <waldron.rick at gmail.com>wrote:
> In my opinion, because it is a point of contention, there should be no
>> special support for statics. It would be written exactly as you have it
>> above, or you could do
> Sounds good to me!
> I've taken my previous tri-lambda-syntax support example (
> https://gist.github.com/2013909) and I've updated the code to use your
> proposed class syntax... It looks nice:
I agree, I think this looks great. Even the statics look pretty clear to me.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss