Finding a "safety syntax" for classes

Rick Waldron waldron.rick at
Tue Mar 20 11:40:19 PDT 2012

> In my opinion, because it is a point of contention, there should be no
> special support for statics. It would be written exactly as you have it
> above, or you could do
Sounds good to me!

I've taken my previous tri-lambda-syntax support example ( and I've updated the code to use your
proposed class syntax... It looks nice:

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list