Finding a "safety syntax" for classes

Rick Waldron waldron.rick at gmail.com
Tue Mar 20 11:40:19 PDT 2012


>
> In my opinion, because it is a point of contention, there should be no
> special support for statics. It would be written exactly as you have it
> above, or you could do
>
>
Sounds good to me!


I've taken my previous tri-lambda-syntax support example (
https://gist.github.com/2013909) and I've updated the code to use your
proposed class syntax... It looks nice:

https://gist.github.com/2139330



Rick
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20120320/f4e1f33f/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list