Callable values: trying to summarize

Axel Rauschmayer axel at rauschma.de
Sun Mar 11 14:34:02 PDT 2012


Not at all. If anything, I have a slight preference for the traditional solution.

On Mar 11, 2012, at 14:52 , François REMY wrote:

> Stunned to read that from someone asking for the arrow syntax, but yes, it’s right.
>  
> From: Axel Rauschmayer
> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 2:46 PM
> To: François REMY
> Cc: es-discuss
> Subject: Re: Callable values: trying to summarize
>> BTW, if we are still going to make 'fn' optionnal, I have one small question: wouldn't it better to allow functions without introductory keyword instead? If it's optionnal, it's up to the developer that uses it to make sure his code is compatible, which seems fine to me.
> 
>  
> With introductory keyword, things are easier to parse.
>  
> --
> Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
> axel at rauschma.de
>  
> home: rauschma.de
> twitter: twitter.com/rauschma
> blog: 2ality.com
>  
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

-- 
Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
axel at rauschma.de

home: rauschma.de
twitter: twitter.com/rauschma
blog: 2ality.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20120311/9978916c/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list