ES Modules: suggestions for improvement

[Wes Garland]

On 26 June 2012 18:36, Aymeric Vitte <vitteaymeric at gmail.com> wrote:

> Node.js's way is good, except the "transitive dependency issue" mentioned
>  in your post which in some cases indeed can cause problems.
>

Does Node not handle transitive dependencies per CommonJS Modules/1.0?


> What I find bad (1) is the need of VMs, let's take node.js's one, it's
> calling c++ stuff, calling itself js's stuff, and at the end things are
> coming back to js (with some imperfections like node.js's VM not binding
> things correctly in some cases)
>

Can you explain this in more detail?  I don't really understand what you're
getting at .




-- 
Wesley W. Garland
Director, Product Development
PageMail, Inc.
+1 613 542 2787 x 102
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20120626/8727dc2f/attachment.html>