Existential operator (was: ||= is much needed?)
jashkenas at gmail.com
Tue Jun 19 12:37:58 PDT 2012
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen at wirfs-brock.com>wrote:
> > foo.bar?(args) <==> foo.bar?.call(foo, args)
> > fun?(args) <==> fun?.call(undefined, args)
> How are these equivalent? Won't fun?.call evaluate to undefined if fun is
> undefined and undefined(undefined,args) will throw...
... check out the compilation:
It doesn't eagerly evaluate to undefined ... the value of the *entire*
expression is undefined if the chain is broken at the existential operator.
That's much of the point of soaks:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss