More fun with undefined
tj at crowdersoftware.com
Fri Jun 15 00:36:06 PDT 2012
On 15 June 2012 08:09, Andreas Rossberg <rossberg at google.com> wrote:
> On 15 June 2012 01:22, Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen at wirfs-brock.com> wrote:
> > A wonder if this wart is hairy enough, that we wouldn't be justified in
> > explicit backwards compatibility hackery in the spec. to remove it.
> > For example, we could allow it to appear in parameter lists and provide a
> > dynamic check to ensure that nothing (other than a real undefined) is
> > passed. Similarly we could explicitly allow:
> > var undefined;
> Actually, for very much the same effect, you could simply treat
> 'undefined' as a (refutable) _pattern_ that is only matched by the
> undefined value. No need to make special rules for var or parameters
Folks, could we move the unrelated discussion to its own thread? This
thread's original subject is rather getting lost here.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss