Ryan Florence wrote: > But if we're adding ?= because we're adding ?: maybe its okay to add > ||= while we're at it? That said, I would hate to see ?= get derailed > because ||= is "dumb". "Dumb" is too strong. How about YAGNI? Every use-case of || I've seen in JS (almost all with the result of || the RHS of an = op) really wants ?=. /be