brendan at mozilla.org
Tue Jun 12 09:54:24 PDT 2012
Mark S. Miller wrote:
> I'm not yet arguing that or the opposite, rather, I'm confused about
> what "non-strict-only" means in this context. Actual stacks consist of
> a mixture of strict and non-strict activations.
This isn't so in personal projects or even all-homegrown products or
shared projects that eschew "use strict", as Charles wrote.
> How would the proposed API deal with that?
Eliding strict frames' arguments, Charles wrote.
I objected that this makes any such stack trace API hard to use in the
large, compared to an information-leaking string-valued .stack approach.
More information about the es-discuss