time to trim mustache
tj at crowdersoftware.com
Tue Jun 5 14:23:48 PDT 2012
On 5 June 2012 21:30, Irakli Gozalishvili <rfobic at gmail.com> wrote:
> I just want to (re)express my (and many others) concern about new syntax. While
> Object.extend adds useful feature (Although I think Object.define would be
> more appropriate name) I don't think new syntax is really necessary. I do
> think that new syntax needs a lot more justification then new semantics.
Sorry, do you mean the new `Name` object stuff? (
Still finding my feet, but not seeing any private stuff in AWB's extension
literals (except by association with `Name` objects).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss