time to trim mustache

T.J. Crowder tj at crowdersoftware.com
Tue Jun 5 14:23:48 PDT 2012


On 5 June 2012 21:30, Irakli Gozalishvili <rfobic at gmail.com> wrote:

> I just want to (re)express my (and many others) concern about new syntax.  While
> Object.extend adds useful feature (Although I think Object.define would be
> more appropriate name) I don't think new syntax is really necessary. I do
> think that new syntax needs a lot more justification then new semantics.
>

Sorry, do you mean the new `Name` object stuff? (
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:private_name_objects) Or...?
Still finding my feet, but not seeing any private stuff in AWB's extension
literals (except by association with `Name` objects).

-- T.J.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20120605/556411e1/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list