time to trim mustache
Kevin Smith
khs4473 at gmail.com
Mon Jun 4 06:41:31 PDT 2012
Thanks Dave,
Of the 3 use cases you mentioned, I think unique names are probably
sufficient for 1 and 3. For the second use case (an inaccessible piece of
data associated with an object), would not a weak map also be appropriate?
So far I don't see that the benefit of private names (as opposed to just
unique names) outweighs the additional object model complexity. As far as
I can tell, all of the use cases for private names can be addressed with
unique names and weak maps. Am I wrong?
Regards,
kevin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20120604/0f8cf9f4/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the es-discuss
mailing list