Two kinds of 
herby at mailbox.sk
Fri Jan 27 04:59:37 PST 2012
Tom Van Cutsem wrote:
> 2012/1/23 Herby Vojčík <herby at mailbox.sk <mailto:herby at mailbox.sk>>
> But it gets harder with getters and setters... maybe if there was an
> API for simulating proper legacy foo[bar] and foo[bar]=baz,
> (Object.get, Object.set?) generic  could be dropped without much
> of a loss.
> We'll have Reflect.get and Reflect.set, see
> (these are the methods referred to as Object.getProperty and
> Object.setProperty that Allen referred to on the object model
> reformation wiki page)
Beautiful. Something like that I had in mind.
Another question comes to mind: here and there some light proposals
towards mirror (a la Self, more-or-less) system appear. Would it not be
confusing and/or clashing if Reflect will be along with something like
that? If some mirror API appears or is planned, should it not be
coordinated with Reflect?
More information about the es-discuss